The fear about what Iran might do with nuclear weapons is fed by the concern that Tehran has no clear reason to be pursuing nuclear weapons. The strategic rationale for Iran’s nuclear program is by no means obvious. Unlike proliferators such as Israel or Pakistan,...
To be included in forthcoming edited Volume “Taming the Next Set of Strategic Weapons Threats.” Presented to the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center by by Mitch Kugler. Jun 30, 2003 AUTHOR: Mitch Kugler International Missile Defense Cooperation and the MTCR (PDF) 31.11 KB International Missile Defense...
To be included in forthcoming edited Volume “Taming the Next Set of Strategic Weapons Threats” Apr 01, 2003 AUTHOR: Patrick Clawson Presentation030401 Clawson Nuclear Prolif TB (PDF) 125.33 KB
Commissioned by the Non-Proliferation Education Center. Mar 19, 2003 AUTHOR: Dennis Gormley and Richard Speier Controlling Unmanned Air Vehicles-New Challenges (PDF) 151.62 KB Controlling Unmanned Air Vehicles: New Challenges I. The threat Even though ballistic missiles dominated missile non-proliferation deliberations during the last decade of...
An analysis presented by NPEC’s Executive Director Henry Sokolski. Dec 03, 2002 AUTHOR: Henry Sokolski Beyond the Agreed Framework-The DPRKs Projected Atomic Bomb Making Cap…. (PDF) 49.72 KB Beyond the Agreed Framework The DPRK’s Projected Atomic Bomb Making Capabilities, 2002-09 An Analysis of the Nonproliferation...
This book was originally commissioned by the NPEC as part of a study on the future of U.S.-Russian nonproliferation cooperation. It is different from other studies of U.S.-Russian cooperation because it relies on competitive strategies, which detail how best to pit one’s strengths against a...
This article on the U.S. policy towards bio-chemical threats for Orbis is also available on their website. Apr 01, 2001 AUTHOR: Henry Sokolski Rethinking Bio-Chemical Dangers (PDF) 67.68 KB Rethinking Bio-Chemical Dangers Last year President Clinton announced the U.S. would spend $10 billion on countering...
With the change of administrations in Washington, current U.S. policy toward North Korea will naturally undergo review and scrutiny. The essays in this volume offer an option to the Clinton-era engagement approach. The authors suggest an alternative strategy for promoting peace and security in the...
Although the United States’ efforts to prevent the spread of strategic weapons have varied significantly since 1945, they all presumed to be avoiding one or another type of strategic war. To the extent their military scenarios were sound, so too were the nonproliferation remedies these...
A decade after Coalition forces targeted Saddam’s missile, nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons capabilities, public concern about strategic weapons proliferation has grown. India, Iraq, North Korea, China, and Pakistan have all renewed their efforts to acquire weapons capable of mass destruction. Meanwhile, growing surpluses of...